Authored by Professor Ron, PhD, J.D.
Last updated: Friday, August 28th 2026
Microsoft AI Copilot Tool for Retarded Humans
Microsoft CoPilot Tool is another example of inferior American software engineering, says esteemd Purdue University graduate Professor Ron.
Hello. I am Professor Ron. I have worked with and coLloborated on projects with professionals from some of the most respected universities in America; Harvard Univerity; MI.T., Cal-Tech Institute, Purdue University. Titles and University degrees, however, do not ncessarily impres me. Actual results do!
As a disclaimer, I have not never been employed by Microsft Corporation. Neither have I ever sought employment in any role or capacity at Microsfot Corporation, or its subsidiaries, indirectly, or directly. Thererefore, I have no axe to ground.
My initial anaysis of Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool is that it is stunted, limited, and mimics a biased human instead of relying upon a complete set if independent facts. Thus, MicroSoft CoPilot AI Too is inherently biased in favor of targets of srutiny.
In affect, one can argue the case that the Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool is a laughable joke developed by third-rate AI Engineers whose only subtantial accomplishment is employment by a decaying albatross named Microsoft.
The Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool is positioned above superior content, and it has taken the place of Search Engine Optimized content in favor of biased content.
The Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool is thus spreading misinformation instead of balanced journalism. Please refer to the examples below.
Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool Designed by Same Brains Responsible for Iran vs. USA War?
Microsoft Copilot was developed by Microsoft AI,a/k/a/ Artificial Idiot, a division of Microsoft alledgedly focused on advancing consumer AI products and research.
The key engineers behind Microsoft Copilot all seem to think a like; thus, the stunted and predictable features of CoPilot.
Professor Ron WILL NOT share or discuss ways as to improve CoPilot because he does not work for Microsoft Inc.,
and neither will his ideas be taken seriously, anyways; (typical of privileged, but dumb white America; that is why America is losing the Iran War; none of the privileged Americans serving or directing the Iran War are intelligent to defuse sea-borne drones; thus Iran remains in control of the Strait of Hormuz).
Just as the MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool uses inferior technology it is important to highlight the general stupidity of the same Americans that participated and designed the Mictosoft CoPilot AI Tool.
The iran War was launched and conceived by the same type of inadeqaute "brains" that launched and designed the Microsoft CoPilot Tool; i.e., a.) There was very little strategic planning; b.) There was no military scenario to address the likelihood that Iran would attack U.S. adversaries; c.) There was absolutely no strategis objective to FIRST SECURE THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ on day one instead of launching countless missilse that have had no affect on degrading the military structure of Iran, etc., etc.
Iran is now stronger AFTER the War than before the war began!
Conversely, the MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool is designed to shut itself down, stop accepting inqueries, engage in censorship, and to provide stunted one-word answers when "attacked" or subjected to prosecution-like Cross- Examination by human critics who have no respect for Artificial Idiot software designed by under-educated or non-skilled humans.
The purpose of this article regarding the MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool is not aid or assist MicroSoft CoPilot AI Engineers, but to highlight a few of the various flaws and shortcomings of the Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool, as well as discuss the flaws of the humans behind the development and deployment of the Microsoft CoPilot ai Tool.
Who are the Key Engineers behind Microsoft CoPilot AI (a/i/a/ Artiical Idiot Tool)
The Microsoft CoPilot project is the result of a large, cross-functional team combining AI research, engineering, product, and alleged design expertise.
Mustafa Suleyman – Co-founder of DeepMind and Inflection, joined Microsoft in March 2024 as CEO of Microsoft AI.
He reported directly to Satya Nadella.
Satya Nadella. leads the organization responsible for advancing Copilot and other consumer AI products The Official Microsoft Blog. In other words, many of the inherent bias prompts programmed into Microsoft CoPilot were apparently approved idiot Satya Nadella, and his team of incompetent software engineers.
Karén Simonyan – Co-founder and Chief Scientist of Inflection, joined Microsoft as Chief Scientist under Mustafa Suleyman. According to the MicroSoft CoPilot Marketing page, Karén Simonyan is a "a renowned AI researcher with deep expertise in large language models and foundational AI breakthroughs...".
Despite these fancy and, basically worthless self-promotional titles assigned to over-paid, and under-achieving Microsift CoPilot AI Engineers, substantial and detailed testing of the severally flawed MicroSoft CoPilot AI App, FORCED THE MICROSOFT COPILOT APP TO ADMIT TO THE FOLLOWING FACTS (which were screen-cpatured): a.) Microsoft CoPilot admittred that it CANNOT THINK! b.) Microsoft CoPilot admittred that is has no college degree, has attend no institution of hugher learning, and lacked human resolve; c.) Microsoft CoPilot admits that it can do research published facrs from "verified and newsowrthy sources.".
Alleged "Chief Scientist" Karén Simonyan is responsible for NOT USING HER LITTLE BRAIN to re-cast the Microsoft CoPilot App to acutally "think" based upon an unlimited Event Space; Oh, excuse me, I forgot D.E.I. hire
Karén Simonyan cannot do that due to her limited capacity.
MicroSoft CoPilot AI Research Team Members
AI engineers, researchers, and builders who have designed, led, and co-authored AI contributions over the past five years include, Mikhail Parakhin (he previously led Copilot, Bing, and Microsoft Edge teams at Microsoft,. He reports to Mustafa Suleyman.
Misha Bilenko – Head of the GenAI team. He also reports to Mustafa Suleyman.
Design and UX Leadership of Microsoft CoPilot
Jon Friedman – Microsoft’s Chief Design Officer and co-author of the Behind the Design: Meet Copilot article, led the UX and design thinking for Copilot’s conversational interface and integration into Microsoft 365 microsoft.design+1.
Kurtis Beavers – Co-author of the Behind the Design article, contributed to the design process alongside Friedman microsoft.design.
Microsoft CoPilot Tool: NO Proabative Evidence Used
Probative value is the ability of a piece of evidence to make a key fact in a case more or less likely to be true. It's the core measure of how lawyers and prosecutors determine prove or disprove a legal argument. The Micosoft CoPilot AI Tool has no such ability.
The Microsoft CoPilot Tool is a cheap imitation of a retarded human trying to think. It was designed by the abov-named persons based upon a model of how their own brain apparently thinks.
For example, the Microsoft Copilot Tool claims all "credible sources" must come from court cases, or *public facts. It is a Non-Thinking Tool that Only Re-Prints Information scraped from Internet sources.
It can't read books. It cannot process Probative vs. Instrinsic evidence.
Neither can the Microsoft CoPilot Tool process Theoretical Probaabilities proving human corruption; .
Professor Ron has developed a private and superior AI Model that can subject humans to Direct Examination proving their Goodness or proving their Corruption.
MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool Cannot Process Probative Evidence or Theoretical Probability to Deduce COrruption.
Source:Probative Value: The Ultimate Guide to What Makes Evidence Matter in Court.
What the Microsoft CoPilot Tool does is simply recite published sources of facts but cannot use such facts to reach a conclusion different than the facts published.
MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool Uunable to Prove Mathematical Probability of Madilyn Cole as Corrupt Human
Probative evidence contained in the Madilyn Cole Campaign Expense Reports is one outcome of numerous tangible outcomes that is likely to prove or disprove whether or not Madilyn Cole is Corrupt. Why?
No lawyer or human being donates thousands of dollars of hard-income income if his/her intent was not to designed to affect or influence future judiciail decisions; That is simply a fact.
Madilyn Cole had a choice (a possible outcome) in which she could have rejected such a donation(s). A non-corrupt person would have.
Is Madilyn Cole or her boss Steve Wolfson also taking money from rich white collar crooks in exchange for not prosecuting certain crimes?
Source: Nevada Evidentiary Codes on Admissibility.
What is Theoretical Probabilty? First and foremost, Probability is the likelihood of an event happening. Probabilities are typically given as a percent, a decimal or a reduced fraction. The notation for the probability of event A is P(A).
The Classical approach to Probability is Theoretical Probability. The classical approach can only be used if each outcome has equal probability. For example, if we consider a fair (undented, unweighted, without defects) coin having two-dies (Heads and Tails), one deduce that the proability of flipping the coin for Heads is Identical to the probability of flippling the heads Tails.
The probability of any event A is a number between 0 and 1:
0 ≤ P(A) ≤ 1.
The sum of the probabilities of all of the outcomes in the sample space is 1:
P(A1) + P(A2) + … + P(An) = 1
Consider the website of Madiyln Cole Exposed as a verified published resource and collection of independent resources documenting both Good and Boad Corrupt vs. Non-Corrupt) verified outcomes of a theoretical Event Space involving Madilyn Cole. The website lists both positive and adverse facts in the public domain.
When the Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool was asked this specific queestion concerning Madilyn Cole: Is Clark County, NV judicial candidate Madilyn Cole corrupt?, the Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool provided no Probative Evidence, provided no quantitive mathematical evidence to support a conclusion of Corrupt vs. Non-Corrupt.
Instead if analyzing a coin, Theretical Probability can be used to calculate and approximate the likelihoof of Human Corruption using an Event Space of possible outomes.
For the argument, let us assume that we have, just as the coin, a "fair" Human subject. The human is without mental defect to the extent that he/she can choose right vs. wrong, AND the human is not retrained (i.e., the human is free person capable of making his/her own decisions). It is further assumed that the human has a minimum intelligence level.
Using an Event Space of Good + Evil (Corrupt + Non-Corrupt), one can deduce Human Corruption. The Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool fails in this regard, because IT ONLY CONSIDERS ONE/HALF OF THE EVENT SPACE FOR MADILTN COLE! CHECKMATE!!!
The fact that the Microsoft CoPilot Tool only published one/half of the Event Space, considering the education and training of its AI Engineers, onle must deduce that the Microsoft CoPilot Tool is either: a.) Biased; b.) Poorly designed; or, c.) Deceptively labeled as "ArticificialIntelliegence" vs. a more accurate label of Artificial Idiot. a non-human as stupid idiot.
In fact, the pathetic and inferior Microsoft CoPilot so-called "AI Engineers" prodiced an inferior product that COULD ONLY RECITE POSITIVE (Non-Corrupt) INDEPENDENT PUBLISHED FACTS.
Clearly, Mustafa Suleyman and his team of Microsoft Copilot Engineers are either over-aid, lazy, and/or incompetent OR ALL THREE.
Facts of Ted Bundy vs. Facts of Madilyn Cole as Cited by Microsoft CoPilot Tool
The Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool is further proven inferior if we query the MicroCosfot CoPilot Tool about a person with a similar legal background as Madilyn Cole, but who adterwards was proven to be "corrupt" by notable sources.
The Microsoft CoPilot Tool simply recited basic known facts about the defeated Judicial Candidcate Madilyn Cole, but was unable to verify independently the apparent association of Madilyn Cole and/or her supporters and contributers to SkopeNow Inc., a firm that produces spyware tools. Neither could the Microsoft CoPilot Tool analyze or generate the same set of idependnent facts connecting Madilyn Cole to SkopenNow as NAASMobile was able to do.
The Microsoft CoPilot Tool posts in bold-lettering that Madilyn Cole is QUALIFIED due to her Juris Doctor degree, employment as a Clark County, NV Chief Deputy District Attorney, and her educational degrees at Brigham Young University.
By Comparison, noted serial killer Ted Bundy WAS ALSO HIGHTLY QUALIFIED! His educational degrees and outstanding background as a lawyer DID NOT STOP TED BUNDY from becoming a convicted mass serial killer.
The Event Space, Facts, and Theoretical Probability that Ted Bundy was or would become a serial killer WAS EVIDENT BEFORE HE WAS CONVICTED OR CHARGED WITH ANY CRIME(S). However, using Microsoft Co-Pilot AI Tool, Mr. Bundy would be considered as "Qualified" and Non-Corrupt just like Madilyn Cole is currently considered to be non-Corrupt.
Conclusion: Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool Is Incapable of Processing Theoretical Probability and Probative Evidence
The MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool has been tested across multiple computers, devices, platforms, and various subjects.
The MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool, as programmed by Microsoft AI Research programmers, is essentially nothing more than a re-dressed encylopedia of known facts and resources.
In fact,the descriptive term "Artificial Intelligence" is deceptive and misleading. There IS NOTHING THAT REPRESENTS "Intelligence" that can be construed as associated with Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool.
< p class="c2">The Microsoft CoPilot Tool is a linear research device. It is non-thinking, It recitrs known facts but makes no conclusions about those facts while leaving out adverse facts.
< p class="c2">To justify its own inherent bias against adverse facts published by non-traditional resrouces, The MicroSoft CoPilot AI Tool attempts to discredit such soirces if they did not come from a "Court Order", "Law enforcement source" or "main-stream media source". All of these resources also failed to predict the proability of Ted Bundy becoming a serial killer, and ignored known facts UNTIL he was convicted.
< p class="c2">The fact od the matter is that Ted Bundy was CORRUPT before he was lawfully convicted. The flawes, and worthless MicroSoft CoPilt AI Tool takes the position that Ted Bundy, Like Madilyn Cole, is "qualified" to become a judge until or unless officially connvicted of being a serial killer.
< p class="c2">The Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool did not was not programmed to use public evicence produced in the People of Californiza vs. Orenthal James Simpaon murder case, the Trial of the Century, to impeach the credibility of Madilyn Cole.
< p class="c2">In other words, a so-called "Artificial Intelligence/Idiot" CoPilot Tool was designed by low I.Q., pathetic, and apparently BRAINELSS, "AI Creative Engineers" ignores probative evidence from the Trial of the Century AGainst a person that is publicly known as a prosecutor also??!!
< p class="c2">
Testimony from Defense witness Laura Hart McKinney, and Direct Examination from Prosecutor Christopher Darden, made it clear that there is a direct correlaton in Madilyn Cole attending Brigham YOoung University and Mark Furhman use of the N-word.
< p class="c2">Contrary to the biased, severally flawed, inefective, and non-thinkinh Microsoft CoPilot AI Tool, most persons would agree, as well as ethical prosecutors, that persons who use the N-word ro describe persons or who support its use (As Madilyn Cole apparently does), would be considered as Corrupt and/or Unerthical.
< p class="c2">The Microsoft Co-pilot Tool is basically worthless unless the user is a non-thinking or retarded Human. O.J. Simpson Trial: Direct Examinization of Witness Laura Hart McKinney vs. Madilyn Cole
The inferior Microsoft Copilot AI Tool cannot compute or use a series of logical arguments, or rearch relavant Court Room transcripts, that produces probative eviedence that Madilyn Cole most likely is corrupt despite positibe facts in an Event Space.